Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/index.jsx (2)

100-102: Yo, this condition's got some repetition, dawg! Let's clean it up!

Extract the reduce operation into a variable to avoid code duplication and improve readability.

+const totalDownChecks = monitor?.groupedDownChecks?.reduce(
+  (count, checkGroup) => count + checkGroup.totalChecks,
+  0
+) ?? 0;
+
-{hoveredIncidentsData !== null ||
-  (monitor?.groupedDownChecks?.reduce((count, checkGroup) => count + checkGroup.totalChecks, 0) > 0) ? (
+{hoveredIncidentsData !== null || totalDownChecks > 0 ? (

---

124-126: The message is straight fire, but let's make it translatable!

Consider using a translation system for the "No incidents" message to support internationalization.

-Great. No incidents, yet!
+{t('incidents.none')}

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

• 🔴 Critical Issues

  • Issue: The current logic assumes that hoveredIncidentsData is always available, which can lead to errors if it's null and there are no incidents.
  • Impact: The component will throw an error, leading to unexpected behavior and a poor user experience.
  • Recommendation: Use optional chaining (?.) and an undefined check to prevent these errors.

• 🟡 Warnings

  • Warning: The "No incidents" message is hardcoded, which violates the "no hardcoded values" rule mentioned in the PR checklist.
  • Potential risks: Inconsistencies in the UI and difficulty maintaining the application.
  • Suggested improvements: Use translations for the "No incidents" message to ensure consistency and ease of updates.

• Authentication/Authorization impacts: None.
• Data handling concerns: None.
• Input validation: The change does not introduce any new input validation concerns.
• Security best practices: The change aligns with security best practices.
• Potential security risks: None identified.
• Mitigation strategies: None required.
• Security testing requirements: None identified.

• Test Coverage:

  • Unit test analysis: The change should be covered by unit tests to ensure that the conditional rendering logic works as expected.
  • Integration test requirements: Integration tests should validate that the change works correctly with the rest of the application.
  • Edge cases coverage: Tests should cover the edge case where hoveredIncidentsData is null and there are no incidents.

• Test Recommendations:

  • Suggested Test Cases:

    it('should display the "No incidents" message when there are no incidents', () => {
      // Arrange
      const monitor = { groupedDownChecks: [] };
      const hoveredIncidentsData = null;
      const { getByText } = render(<ChartBoxes monitor={monitor} hoveredIncidentsData={hoveredIncidentsData} />);

      // Act & Assert
      expect(getByText('Great. No incidents, yet!')).toBeInTheDocument();
    });

    it('should not throw an error when hoveredIncidentsData is null and there are no incidents', () => {
      // Arrange
      const monitor = { groupedDownChecks: [] };
      const hoveredIncidentsData = null;

      // Act & Assert
      expect(() => render(<ChartBoxes monitor={monitor} hoveredIncidentsData={hoveredIncidentsData} />)).not.toThrow();
    });

• Coverage improvements: Ensure that the tests cover all possible scenarios, including edge cases.
• Performance testing needs: None identified.

• Documentation updates needed: The documentation should be updated to reflect the changes in the incident display logic.
• Long-term maintenance considerations: The change introduces a new layout for the "No incidents" scenario. It's important to ensure that this layout is maintained and updated as needed.
• Technical debt and monitoring requirements: None identified.

• Deployment impact and strategy: The change should be deployed as part of a regular release cycle.
• Key operational considerations: None identified.

Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/EmptyView.jsx (2)

5-13: Yo, let's make this component more theme-consistent and responsive!

The component looks solid, but we could improve it by:

1. Using theme spacing for margins
2. Using theme typography variants for consistent styling

Here's a more theme-consistent version:

-const EmptyView = ({ message = "No Data", size = "h2" }) => {
+const EmptyView = ({ message = "No Data", size = "h2", spacing = 8 }) => {
     return (
-        <Box m="auto" marginY="25%">
+        <Box 
+            m="auto" 
+            marginY={(theme) => theme.spacing(spacing)}
+            textAlign="center"
+        >
             <Typography variant={size}>
                 {message}
             </Typography>
         </Box>
     );
 };

---

15-20: Yo, let's beef up these PropTypes!

The PropTypes are good but could be more robust:

1. Make message required since it's a core prop
2. Add PropTypes for the spacing prop

 EmptyView.propTypes = {
-    message: PropTypes.string,
+    message: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
     size: PropTypes.oneOf(['h1', 'h2', 'h3', 'h4', 'h5', 'h6', 'body1', 'body2']),
+    spacing: PropTypes.number
 };

Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/index.jsx (2)

40-81: Yo, this function's got a lot on its plate!

The renderUptime function could use some cleanup:

1. Extract the hover timestamp display into a separate component
2. Use theme typography variants instead of hard-coded font sizes

-                            fontSize={11}
+                            variant="caption"

Also, consider extracting the timestamp display:

const TimeStamp = ({ time, dateFormat, uiTimezone }) => (
    <Typography
        component="h5"
        position="absolute"
        top="100%"
        variant="caption"
        color={(theme) => theme.palette.primary.contrastTextTertiary}
    >
        {formatDateWithTz(time, dateFormat, uiTimezone)}
    </Typography>
);

---

165-175: Yo, let's make these PropTypes more specific!

The PropTypes could be more detailed, especially for complex objects:

-    monitor: PropTypes.object,
+    monitor: PropTypes.shape({
+        upChecks: PropTypes.shape({
+            totalChecks: PropTypes.number
+        }),
+        downChecks: PropTypes.shape({
+            totalChecks: PropTypes.number
+        }),
+        avgResponseTime: PropTypes.number,
+        groupedUpChecks: PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.shape({
+            totalChecks: PropTypes.number,
+            _id: PropTypes.string
+        })),
+        groupedDownChecks: PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.shape({
+            totalChecks: PropTypes.number,
+            _id: PropTypes.string
+        }))
+    }),

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

src/Components/Charts/ChartBox/index.jsx (1)

7-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Yo dawg, let's complete those PropTypes!

I noticed some props being used but not validated. Let's fix that to keep our code tight!

Add these missing PropTypes:

 ChartBox.propTypes = {
   children: PropTypes.node,
   icon: PropTypes.node,
   header: PropTypes.string,
   height: PropTypes.string,
   noDataMessage: PropTypes.string,
-  isEmpty: PropTypes.bool
+  isEmpty: PropTypes.bool,
+  justifyContent: PropTypes.string,
+  Legend: PropTypes.node,
+  borderRadiusRight: PropTypes.number,
+  sx: PropTypes.object
 };

🧰 Tools

🪛 ESLint

[error] 12-12: 'justifyContent' is missing in props validation

(react/prop-types)

---

[error] 13-13: 'Legend' is missing in props validation

(react/prop-types)

---

[error] 14-14: 'borderRadiusRight' is missing in props validation

(react/prop-types)

---

[error] 15-15: 'sx' is missing in props validation

(react/prop-types)

---

[error] 15-15: 'sx' is defined but never used.

(no-unused-vars)

src/Components/Charts/ChartBox/EmptyView.jsx (1)

7-15: Lose yourself in the optimization! 🎤

Consider memoizing this component to prevent unnecessary re-renders when parent updates.

+import { memo } from 'react';

 const EmptyView = ({
     icon,
     header,
     message = "No Data",
     size = "h2",
     borderRadiusRight = 4,
     justifyContent = "flex-start",
     height = "300px"
-}) => {
+}) => memo(() => {
     const theme = useTheme();
     // ... rest of the component
-};
+});

🧰 Tools

🪛 ESLint

[error] 12-12: 'borderRadiusRight' is missing in props validation

(react/prop-types)

---

[error] 13-13: 'justifyContent' is missing in props validation

(react/prop-types)

---

[error] 14-14: 'height' is missing in props validation

(react/prop-types)

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro